I have worn an Apple Watch almost every day for close to eight years.

Mine is an old 44 mm aluminium model. The battery is nowhere near what it once was, and technologically it is several generations behind the current Apple Watch.

But it still works.

It tracks my walks, swimming, gym sessions and cycling. It gives me heart-rate and pace data. The Activity rings still manage to push me occasionally. And because my brother and I share activity, there is even a small amount of competition involved.

So why am I thinking about replacing it?

Not because it has failed.

The problem is that I would quite like to wear a normal watch again.

That led me to two very different alternatives: the Oura Ring 5 and WHOOP 5.0.

Neither tries to be another smartwatch.

And that makes the comparison much more interesting.

Disclosure: This article contains Amazon affiliate links. If you buy through one of these links, I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

The three options I am comparing

For this comparison, I am looking at:

	Apple Watch Series 12	Oura Ring 5	WHOOP Peak
Reference price	From $399	$399 Silver	$239/year
Format	Smartwatch	Ring	Screenless band
Battery	Around a day	Several days	Around two weeks
Subscription required	No	Yes for full experience	Yes
Workout display	Yes	No	No
Calls/messages on device	Yes	No	No
Swimming	Yes	Yes	Yes
Weightlifting	Yes	Ring may need to come off	Yes
Apple Health integration	Native	Yes	Yes

Prices and availability vary by country and retailer, so I would treat these as reference prices rather than universal shopping prices.

The bigger difference is not actually price.

It is what each device is trying to be.

Apple Watch is a smartwatch that also tracks health and fitness.

Oura is a ring designed to disappear into the background.

WHOOP is a screenless fitness tracker built around continuous data collection.

What I actually use my Apple Watch for

After almost eight years, I have discovered that I use far fewer Apple Watch features than I probably thought I would.

For exercise, the things I genuinely care about are quite simple.

When I power walk, I look at pace.

The Watch gives me an update after each kilometre, and that works well for me because I like having clear numerical targets.

Heart rate is also useful.

I am less interested in whether the number is perfectly accurate to the last beat than whether I can see the trend over time.

I track:

• walking
• swimming
• gym sessions
• cycling
• most other exercise I happen to do

I do not particularly care about calorie estimates.

I rarely look at steps.

I have never really used VO2 max or cardio-fitness numbers.

And although modern wearables increasingly try to tell you how recovered you are and whether you should train, I am not particularly interested in that.

I normally know how my body feels.

The Activity rings actually do motivate me

This is one of the Apple Watch features I initially thought might become a gimmick.

It did not.

I am still slightly irritated when a ring is almost closed.

There have definitely been days when I have walked another ten minutes simply because the Watch was telling me I was close.

I also share activity with my brother.

Seeing that he has completed his rings creates just enough competition to make it interesting.

That kind of behavioural nudge is difficult to measure on a specification sheet.

But if a wearable makes you move more often, that may be more valuable than having another ten health metrics that you never look at.

Fit matters more with a ring than I expected

This is particularly relevant if you are a bigger person.

I have not used an Oura Ring, but I did buy a Circular 2 smart ring when it launched on Kickstarter.

I do not think I have unusually large fingers.

Even so, I ended up close to the largest size available.

That experience made me much less willing to assume that a smart ring will fit simply because the advertised size range looks generous.

A watch strap or WHOOP band gives you quite a lot of adjustment.

A ring does not.

It needs to fit closely enough for the sensors to work properly, while still being comfortable when your fingers change slightly in size during exercise, warm weather or overnight.

If I bought an Oura Ring, I would absolutely use the sizing kit first rather than ordering based on my normal jewellery size.

For bigger people, or anyone with larger fingers, this is worth checking before getting too attached to the idea of a ring.

Apple Watch Series 12 — the obvious upgrade

The rational option would be extremely simple:

buy another Apple Watch.

The current Apple Watch starts around the same price as an Oura Ring and gives me the same basic experience I already know, just with considerably newer sensors, health features and battery technology.

Why I would keep Apple Watch

The ecosystem is probably its biggest advantage for me.

I use an iPhone.

There are several Apple products at home.

And I already have close to eight years of activity and health history in Apple Health.

There is almost no friction.

It also does one thing that both Oura and WHOOP fundamentally cannot replace:

it tells me when someone is trying to contact me.

I have disabled most unnecessary notifications.

I do not need emails, news alerts and every app vibrating on my wrist.

But calls and important messages are useful.

My phone is normally silent, and I do not carry it in my hand all day.

The Watch is often how I notice somebody is calling or sending me a message.

The problem

It is still a smartwatch.

If I wear it, I am not wearing one of my analogue watches.

That sounds trivial compared with heart-rate sensors and fitness tracking, but after almost eight years it has become surprisingly important to me.

I like normal watches.

I would like to start wearing them again.

[Check Apple Watch Series 12 price on Amazon]

Oura Ring 5 — the most discreet option

The Oura Ring 5 approaches the problem from almost the opposite direction.

There is no screen.

There is no watch face.

It is simply a ring collecting data in the background.

What attracts me to Oura

It looks good.

That matters to me.

Several people I work with wear Oura rings, and they look like jewellery rather than technology.

I could wear whatever analogue watch I wanted and still collect activity and health data.

Oura is also particularly focused on sleep, readiness and long-term health trends.

And because it integrates with Apple Health, changing trackers would not necessarily mean abandoning the Apple ecosystem completely.

The problem for me is the gym

This is probably the biggest issue.

A metal ring is not something I particularly want between my hand and a barbell or kettlebell.

Oura itself advises caution with activities involving significant friction.

But gym training is one of the main activities I actually want a wearable to track.

If I regularly need to remove the tracker for one of my important forms of exercise, that weakens the argument for it.

Swimming is much less problematic.

Ring sizing would make me cautious

My Circular 2 experience also sits in the back of my mind.

Even though I do not consider my fingers especially large, I ended up close to the top of that product’s size range.

I would therefore never buy an Oura Ring without using the sizing kit first.

That is a much bigger consideration with a ring than with an adjustable band.

Sleep is interesting, but not enough to sell me on its own

Oura’s sleep analysis is one of its major attractions.

I am curious about sleep data.

But I also think there is a danger of collecting data simply because it exists.

I generally sleep well.

With small children, a supposedly bad night’s sleep can sometimes have a very obvious explanation.

I also do not particularly want to look at a sleep score in the morning, become worried about it, and then sleep worse the following night because I am thinking about my sleep.

For somebody trying to fix their sleep, the data may be extremely useful.

For me, I am not sure it would materially change my behaviour.

[Check Oura Ring 5 price on Amazon]

WHOOP Peak — probably the most interesting alternative for me

WHOOP is the option I originally knew least about.

The more I look at it, the more it seems to match what I am actually trying to achieve.

WHOOP is a screenless band.

There are deliberately no calls, messages or apps on the wrist.

For me, that means I could wear:

analogue watch on one wrist, WHOOP on the other.

That would not bother me.

It works for the activities I actually do

This is where WHOOP starts becoming particularly interesting.

I could leave it on during:

• walking
• gym training
• swimming
• cycling
• normal daily activity

That solves one of the problems I have with the ring format.

I would not need to remove the tracker before picking up a barbell.

It also has much longer battery life than an Apple Watch and is designed around continuous wear.

I do not actually need another screen

The more I think about it, the less important a display becomes.

During a power walk I occasionally look at pace.

But most of the time, I am more interested in what happened afterwards.

I want to see whether:

• pace is improving
• heart rate is changing
• workouts are becoming easier
• activity is consistent

I do not need another tiny screen for most of that.

The downside is the subscription

WHOOP is structurally different from buying an Apple Watch.

The membership is the product.

WHOOP Peak is around $239 per year, with the hardware included as part of the membership.

That changes the economics considerably.

Over three years, that is roughly $717.

My current Apple Watch has lasted close to eight years.

That sets quite a high benchmark.

A subscription is fine if I continue getting real value from it.

But if I wear WHOOP enthusiastically for six months and then lose interest, the economics look very different.

[Check WHOOP Peak price on Amazon]

Blood pressure makes the comparison more complicated

One feature I would genuinely like from a future wearable is better blood-pressure information.

This is also an area where the marketing language needs to be read carefully.

A modern Apple Watch can look for patterns associated with hypertension, but that is not the same as taking a normal blood-pressure reading with systolic and diastolic numbers.

Oura is not a replacement for a blood-pressure cuff either.

WHOOP goes somewhat further with its higher-end WHOOP Life / MG offering, which can provide estimated blood-pressure insights after calibration.

But that feature is not included with WHOOP Peak.

It requires the more expensive WHOOP Life membership.

And even then, I would still view it as additional wellness information rather than a replacement for a proper medical blood-pressure measurement.

So blood pressure is interesting to me.

But it is not currently enough to decide the purchase on its own.

Notifications may be the Apple Watch feature I would miss most

This was something I only realised when thinking through this comparison.

I do not use many traditional smartwatch features.

But I do use notifications.

Not lots of notifications.

Just the important ones.

WHOOP deliberately does not provide wrist notifications.

Oura does not replace the Apple Watch experience of having calls or messages appear on your wrist either.

That means neither can perform the simple function:

someone calls me → my wrist tells me.

Because my phone is normally silent and not always in my pocket, I suspect I would miss that more than almost any advanced smartwatch feature.

I care more about trends than perfect numbers

Another thing this comparison has made clear is that I am probably not the ideal customer for every recovery feature these products offer.

I like data.

But I mostly use it to see direction.

When I walk, I care whether my pace is improving.

I care whether the same activity feels easier.

Heart rate is useful because I can compare similar sessions over time.

I do not need a wearable to decide whether I am allowed to train today.

WHOOP puts considerably more emphasis on recovery and strain.

Oura puts considerable emphasis on sleep and readiness.

Those may be excellent features.

They simply are not the main reason I personally want a wearable.

What about my existing Apple Health history?

This is another reason changing devices is not completely straightforward.

I have years of activity information in Apple Health.

That matters to me more than having the newest hardware.

With Apple Watch, obviously, everything remains native.

Oura and WHOOP can both integrate with Apple Health, which makes switching considerably less disruptive.

But I would still want to understand what data stays available if I stopped paying for a subscription several years from now.

That is one advantage of the Apple approach.

My Watch is very old.

I have not paid Apple an annual fee to keep using the data it collected.

There is something reassuring about that.

Which one fits my use case best?

I have not personally tested Oura or WHOOP, so I cannot pretend I know what living with either one is actually like.

But based on what I care about today, the trade-offs are becoming quite clear.

Apple Watch

Makes most sense if I prioritise:

• workout tracking
• live pace and heart-rate information
• notifications
• swimming
• Apple Health
• simplicity
• no mandatory subscription

The disadvantage is obvious:

I am still wearing an Apple Watch instead of one of my normal watches.

Oura Ring

Makes most sense if I prioritise:

• discreet tracking
• sleep
• general health trends
• long battery life
• wearing an analogue watch
• something that looks more like jewellery than technology

For me, removing it for weight training and making sure the ring size works are the biggest weaknesses.

WHOOP

Makes most sense if I prioritise:

• wearing an analogue watch
• continuous workout tracking
• gym training
• swimming
• long battery life
• screenless tracking
• analysis after the workout rather than during it

Its weaknesses for me are the annual subscription and the loss of call/message notifications.

What would I choose today?

I am not quite ready to give a definitive answer.

The Apple Watch is the sensible choice.

I already know it works for me.

It has motivated me for years.

It fits perfectly into the Apple ecosystem.

And notifications are more useful to me than I realised.

The Oura Ring is probably the most elegant choice.

But it also appears to fit my actual training routine least well because I would probably remove it during gym sessions.

The WHOOP is the most interesting experiment.

A screenless band would let me wear a normal watch again while still tracking almost everything I care about.

That is very appealing.

But I would have to accept that I was giving up wrist notifications and moving from buying a piece of hardware to paying for an ongoing service.

And if blood-pressure insights became part of the decision, WHOOP Life rather than Peak would be the relevant comparison.

So at the moment:

I have not replaced my Apple Watch.

But for the first time in almost eight years, I am seriously considering whether my next fitness tracker actually needs to be a watch.

Final thoughts

Wearables have become much more specialised.

Apple Watch tries to do almost everything.

Oura tries to disappear onto your finger and understand what your body is doing in the background.

WHOOP deliberately removes the screen and concentrates on continuous fitness and health tracking.

After almost eight years with an Apple Watch, I think the most useful question is not:

Which device has the most features?

It is:

Which features actually change what I do?

For me, those are still relatively simple:

• track my workouts
• show useful heart-rate and pace trends
• give me enough motivation to move
• keep a long-term record
• and preferably let me wear one of my normal watches again

That makes the decision much closer than I expected.